Back to the
Feature Article





Feature Story August-September 2004


Table 1 from:

Transgenic Virus Resistant Papaya: The Hawaiian ‘Rainbow’ was Rapidly Adopted by Farmers and is of Major Importance in Hawaii Today


Table 1. Relation of farm sizes to historical acreage, 1999 transgenic and nontransgenic acreage, net change, and percentage of acreage that is transgenic in the Puna growing region.

Farm sizea Range
acres
Avg

(NT+T)

acres
No.

growers

Historicalb

acreage (%)

1999 Papaya acreage Net change

(NT-Historical) as:

acres (% of Historical)
% T acres

farm size

T/(N + T)
Nontransgenic

NT (%)c

Transgenic

T (%)

Total

NT+T

Large 86-305 162 4 565 (40) 354 (35) 292 (37) 646 -211 (-37) 45
Medium 21-49.9 28 21 344 (24) 314 (32) 274 (34) 588 -30 (-9) 47
Med.-small 6-20.9 11 45 403 (28) 312 (31) 190.5 (24) 502.5 -91 (-23) 38
Small 1-5.9 3 20 78 (6) 23 (3) 36.5 (5) 59.5 -55 (-71) 61
No farm/1999 0 0 3 33 (2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 (-100) 0
Total 93 1423 (100) 1003 (100) 793 (100) 1796 -420 (-30) --

 a Farm size is defined by the range of acres in each category. For example, acreage of Small farms ranged from 1 to 5.9 acres and for the four Large growers the farm acreage ranged from 86 to 305 acres.

 b Historical acres refers to the total papaya acreage in the Puna region just prior to the first observation of papaya ringspot virus infection on papaya. Thus, historical data was reported for different years, from 1992 when papaya ringspot virus first entered the Puna area, to 1997 at which time all farmers in this survey had observed infected plants in their fields.

 c Percent of acreage by farm size.


Source: Gonsalves, Lee, and Gonsalves, 2004



© Copyright 2004 by The American Phytopathological Society

American Phytopathological Society
3340 Pilot Knob Road
St. Paul, MN 55121-2097
e-mail: aps@scisoc.org