|
|
|
VIEW ARTICLE
Special Topics
Rhizobacteria of Sugar Beets: Effects of Seed Application and Root Colonization on Yield. T. V. Suslow, Former graduate student, Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Berkeley 94720; M. N. Schroth, professor, Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Berkeley 94720. Phytopathology 72:199-206. Accepted for publication 15 May 1981. Copyright 1982 The American Phytopathological Society. DOI: 10.1094/Phyto-72-199.
Selected strains of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. isolated from the rhizosphere-rhizoplane of field-grown sugar beets caused statistically significant yield increases of sugar beets in replicated greenhouse studies and field trials when applied as a seed-coating formulation. Significant increases in dry and fresh weight of seedling roots and/or shoots of plants grown in the greenhouse ranged from 20 to 85%. The effect did not occur in sterile University of California mix or in peat soils. Significant growth increases in seedling weight, mature root weight, and total sucrose yield were attained in field trials in California and Idaho over a 3-yr period. Increases in root weight and total sucrose, averaging 13% above untreated controls, were as great as 4.6 t/ha and 26.8 cwt/ha, respectively. Protocols were developed for the application and preservation of populations of up to 1012 colony-forming units (cfu) of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on seed, using cellulose methyl ether or gum xanthan in combination with neutralized peat or talc coatings. The seed application techniques developed were compatible with commercial planting procedures used for field trials. Colonization of roots by PGPR resistant to rifampicin and nalidixic persisted throughout the growing season, reaching populations as great as 5.2 × 104 cfu/cm of root. Populations of PGPR reached 103–104 cfu/cm of treated roots compared with natural populations of total fluorescent pseudomonads, which ranged from 90 to 500 cfu/cm of root. In vitro antibiosis by PGPR strains was observed against Erwinia carotovora subspp. carotovora and atroseptica; Pseudomonas marginalis pv. marginalis; P. syringae pv. syringae, pv. phaseolicola, and pv. tomato; and fungal pathogens Rhizoctonia solani, Pythium ultimum, P. aphanider-matum, and P. debaryanum. The antagonism was biostatic rather than biocidal. The establishment of high populations of antagonistic PGPR on roots appears related to plant growth promotion effects.
Additional keywords: biological control, bacterization.
|