VIEW ARTICLE

Ecology and Epidemiology

Factors Associated with Variation in Susceptibility of Grapevine Pruning Wounds to Infection by Eutypa lata. G. P. Munkvold, Assistant professor, Department of Plant Pathology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; J. J. Marois, professor, Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis 95616. Phytopathology 85:249-256. Accepted for publication 4 November 1994. Copyright 1995 The American Phytopathological Society. DOI: 10.1094/Phyto-85-249.

Pruning wounds are the only important infection site for Eutypa lata, the cause of Eutypa dieback. In 1989–1991, the susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds inoculated with E. lata was significantly affected by date of pruning. Wound susceptibility was highest when vines were pruned early in the dormant season (November or December) and lower when vines were pruned later in the dormant season (January or March). Wound susceptibility declined significantly during the 28 days following pruning, except for fall pruning in one experiment. The decline in susceptibility was highly correlated with an increase in suberin and lignin deposition (r = 0.64–0.92) and with degree-day accumulation (r = 0.83–0.85). The rate of increase of suberin and lignin was also highly correlated with the rate of accumulation of degree-days over 0 C (r = 0.93–0.99). The growth of populations of nonpathogenic microorganisms on the wound surfaces also was dependent on pruning date and was correlated with degree-day accumulation. Microorganism populations increased more rapidly when vines were pruned in early spring than in fall or early winter. The age of wood at the time of pruning did not significantly affect susceptibility. Grape cultivars were significantly different in their susceptibility to infection by E. lata, but their relative susceptibility was not always consistent between two field experiments.