February
2002
, Volume
86
, Number
2
Pages
156
-
161
Authors
P. A.
Abbasi
,
J.
Al-Dahmani
,
F.
Sahin
,
H. A. J.
Hoitink
, and
S. A.
Miller
,
Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster 44691
Affiliations
Go to article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted for publication 8 October 2001.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Field trials were conducted over 2 years to assess the effects of compost amendments on disease development in organic and conventional processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) production systems. The incidence of anthracnose fruit rot was reduced in organic tomato plots amended with a high rate of composted cannery wastes compared with the incidence in nonamended control plots in 1998 when disease incidence was high. Marketable yield was increased by 33% in compost-amended organic plots. Plots amended with a high compost rate had more ripe fruit than the nonamended control. The incidence of anthracnose and of total disease on fruit was less on the cultivar OH 8245 than on Peto 696. Total fruit yield of OH 8245 but not Peto 696 in organic plots was increased by amendment with composted cannery wastes. In conventional tomato production, composted yard wastes increased disease severity on foliage both years but reduced bacterial spot incidence on fruit in 1997, when disease pressure was high. The incidence of anthracnose was not affected by composted yard wastes. Marketable and total fruit yields of Peto 696 were not increased in compost-amended conventional plots. The plant activator Actigard reduced foliar disease severity and the incidence of bacterial spot and anthracnose on fruit, while increasing yield of marketable fruit.
JnArticleKeywords
Additional keywords:
benzothiadiazole,
biological control,
compost-induced control of foliar plant diseases,
compost-induced systemic resistance,
organic soil amendments
Page Content
ArticleCopyright
© 2002 The American Phytopathological Society