January
2008
, Volume
92
, Number
1
Pages
25
-
29
Authors
Dong-Soo Park, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, and National Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, Rural Development Administration, Neidong 1085, Milyang, Kyeongnam, Republic of Korea;
Ronald J. Sayler, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville;
Yeon-Gyu Hong and
Min-Hee Nam, National Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea; and
Yinong Yang, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Affiliations
Go to article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted for publication 1 September 2007.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Sheath blight of rice, caused by Rhizoctonia solani, is one of the most important rice diseases worldwide; however, no rice cultivar has been found to be completely resistant to this fungus. To facilitate detailed analysis of sheath blight resistance at genetic, molecular, biochemical, and functional genomic levels, new methods were developed for effective and uniform infection and accurate evaluation of the disease. The efficiency of R. solani infection was tested on two resistant (Tetep and Jasmine 85) and two susceptible (Chucheongbyeo, Junambyeo) cultivars using three different inoculum types (agar block, liquid cultured mycelia ball, and mycelia suspension). By covering the inoculated sheaths with aluminum foil to maintain humidity, 100% infection rate was achieved in this study. Liquid cultured mycelia balls caused significantly longer lesions (5.4 cm) than other types of inoculum, including agar block (2.4 cm) and mycelia suspension (1.6 cm). An improved method for evaluating sheath blight disease was selected by comparing two methods for evaluating disease severity among three partially resistant cultivars and five susceptible cultivars inoculated with liquid cultured mycelia balls. In addition, a new formula was developed to calculate the disease susceptibility index. Lesion length and the susceptibility index generally were correlated in each leaf, but there were discrepancies between the two evaluation methods due to differences in plant architecture among the cultivars. The susceptibility index calculated using the new formula was the most accurate method for evaluating sheath blight disease across all cultivars. The effect of heading date and panicle number also was evaluated in relation to sheath blight resistance. Cultivars with late heading dates generally were more resistant to sheath blight than those with early heading dates.
JnArticleKeywords
Additional keywords:
disease assay, host resistance
Page Content
ArticleCopyright
© 2008 The American Phytopathological Society