November
2009
, Volume
99
, Number
11
Pages
1,273
-
1,280
Authors
O. Carisse,
D. M. Tremblay,
C. A. Lévesque,
K. Gindro,
P. Ward, and
A. Houde
Affiliations
First and second authors: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Horticultural Research and Development Centre, 430 Gouin Blvd., Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Québec J3B 3E6, Canada; third author: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada; fourth author: Swiss Federal Research Station Agroscope Changins-Wädenswil ACW, Route de Duillier, P.O. Box 1012, CH-1260 Nyon, Switzerland; fifth and sixth authors: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Food Research and Development Centre, 3600 Casavant Blvd. West, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 8E3, Canada.
Go to article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted for publication 30 June 2009.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The use of a DNA-based method for quantifying airborne inoculum of Botrytis squamosa, a damaging pathogen of onion, was investigated. A method for purifying DNA from conidia collected using rotating-arm samplers and quantifying it using a TaqMan real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay is described. The sensitivity of the qPCR assay was high, with a detection limit of 2 conidia/rod. A linear relationship between numbers of conidia counted with a compound microscope and those determined with the qPCR assay was obtained. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the reliability of the two methods of conidia quantification (microscope examination and qPCR assay) to predict the risk of disease being below or above a damage threshold (Dth). In total, 142 field samples from commercial onion fields were analyzed. At damage thresholds of 5 or 10 lesions/leaf, conidia quantification with the qPCR assay was more reliable at predicting disease risk than conidia quantification based on microscope counts. The proportion of decisions where the disease was present and predicted was higher for the qPCR assay than for the microscope counts, with values of 0.95 and 0.89 compared with 0.79 and 0.81 for Dth of 5 and 10 lesions/leaf, respectively. The proportion of decisions where the disease was present but not predicted was lower for the qPCR assay than for microscope counts, with values of 0.05 and 0.11 compared with 0.20 and 0.19 for Dth of 5 and 10 lesions/leaf, respectively. The results demonstrated that this new qPCR assay was reliable for quantifying B. squamosa airborne inoculum in commercial onion fields and that molecular conidia quantification could be used as a component of a risk management system for Botrytis leaf blight.
JnArticleKeywords
Additional keywords:disease management, spore trap.
Page Content
ArticleCopyright
© 2009 The American Phytopathological Society