April
2002
, Volume
86
, Number
4
Pages
356
-
361
Authors
Douglas J.
Mills
,
C. Benjamin
Coffman
, and
John R.
Teasdale
,
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory, Plant Sciences Institute, Henry A. Wallace-Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705
;
Kathryne L.
Everts
,
Department of Natural Resource Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, Lower Eastern Shore Research and Education Center, Salisbury 21801, and Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Delaware, Research and Education Center, Georgetown 19947
; and
James D.
Anderson
,
Associate Director, Plant Sciences Institute, Henry A. Wallace-Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705
Affiliations
Go to article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted for publication 23 October 2001.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The use of mulch or compost to reduce foliar disease in fresh market tomato could reduce fungicide use. Between 1997 and 1999, foliar disease was monitored in tomatoes grown in beds with bare soil, black polyethylene, composted dairy manure, or hairy vetch. Early blight was reduced in plots with vetch compared with bare soil or compost in all years and compared with polyethylene cover in 1 year. Early blight was reduced in plots with polyethylene versus compost and bare soil in 1 and 2 years, respectively. Septoria leaf spot was reduced in plots with vetch versus other bed strategies in 1998 and bare soil or compost in 1999. This disease was reduced in plots with polyethylene versus bare soil or compost in 1998 and 1999. Soil coverage of tomato leaflets and soil particle dispersal were reduced in plots with polyethylene or vetch versus bare soil or compost in both years that these variables were assessed. Sensor wetness duration was reduced in plots with polyethylene or vetch versus bare soil or compost in one of two years. These findings suggest that foliar disease reduction in mulch was associated with reduced splash dispersal and, in one year, reduced leaf wetness.
JnArticleKeywords
Additional keywords:
high input,
low input,
sustainable agriculture
Page Content
ArticleCopyright
The American Phytopathological Society, 2002