August
2008
, Volume
92
, Number
8
Pages
1,164
-
1,170
Authors
Megumi Yoshida,
Takashi Nakajima,
Michiyoshi Arai,
Fumihiko Suzuki, and
Kenta Tomimura, Research Team for Fusarium Head Blight Control, National Agricultural Research Center for Kyushu Okinawa Region (KONARC), 2421 Suya, Koshi, Kumamoto 861-1192, Japan
Affiliations
Go to article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted for publication 28 March 2008.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Fungicide application is one measure available to reduce the risk of Fusarium head blight (FHB) and mycotoxin contamination in barley. The stage at or near anthesis, or at full head emergence, is generally thought to be optimal for fungicide application, regardless of cultivar. However, we have previously found that the most critical time for Fusarium graminearum infection and mycotoxin accumulation in barley differs among cultivars. Whereas chasmogamous (open-flowering) cultivars were most susceptible at anthesis, cleistogamous (closed-flowering) cultivars were considerably resistant at anthesis but became susceptible after ‘spent’ anther extrusion. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of the timing of fungicide application on FHB and mycotoxin (deoxynivalenol and nivalenol) accumulation in cleistogamous barley. Thiophanate-methyl fungicide was applied at different developmental stages, from before anthesis to 30 days after anthesis (DAA), under artificial inoculation conditions in the field in which inoculum spores were provided throughout the testing period. As expected, the optimal timing for chemical control of FHB and mycotoxin accumulation was the time around the beginning of spent anther extrusion rather than at anthesis. Later application, as late as 30 DAA, was also effective in controlling mycotoxin accumulation, although it was not effective in controlling disease levels.
JnArticleKeywords
Additional keywords:benzimidazole, cleistogamy, Gibberella zeae, Hordeum vulgare, scab, trichothecene
Page Content
ArticleCopyright
© 2008 The American Phytopathological Society